In need of gas detection or safety equipment? Call us on 02920 759 683 | Alternatively, please email [email protected] X
0
Emergency Rescue and Recovery of Casualties
01/11/2019

Facial Hair vs Respiratory Protective Equipment

Posted by Rhys Redrup
Facial Hair vs Respiratory Protective Equipment

Introduction: Why Facial Hair and RPE Policies Are Under Debate

When it comes down to facial hair and its policies relating to the use of respirators, this has become a hot topic of debate in various work environments for the last few decades, and for a good reason.

In this article, we’ll discuss the benefits of having the right policy implemented and how drastically it can impact the safety of your workers.

HSE Guidance and the Evolution of RPE Protocols

In the UK, The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has developed protocols for both employers and employees since the 19th century. In relation to respiratory protective equipment (RPE), numerous studies have been conducted in the past to test the effectiveness of different devices, such as the FFP3 test.

The Impact of Stubble Growth on FFP3 Protection

During this study of Respiratory Protective Equipment, tests were carried out on fifteen male volunteers; this was to deduce how impactful 0 – 7 days stubble growth was on the protection given by FFP3 filtering facepieces and half masks. They concluded that it mostly came down to the mask/wearer combination. Protection would gradually worsen as stubble would grow (in some cases, after as little as 24 hours after shaving), though would generally be a worsening factor as facial hair grew. Their statistical analysis predicted this could reach an unacceptable level for all of the masks tested.

The Four Classes

Four classes were devised to assess the competency of companies’ RPE policies, there were:

  • Proficient – companies with a fit-for-purpose RPE programme, managers with an acceptable level of RPE competence.
  • Developers – companies with systems in place, and generally aware of what they need to do, but still some way to go with the implementation of their RPE programme.
  • Learners – companies without fully effective RPE practices, managers in the process of establishing a formal RPE programme.
  • Fortuitous – companies with workers protected from respiratory hazards despite a significant RPE. knowledge and skills gap at the managerial level and the absence of a structured RPE programme.

If you would like to chat with a specialist or would like to know more about our respirators range or email [email protected].

Contact Us

Back to news